Search Verdict

Ardent Pulse Track review: the most accurate GPS we have measured, wrapped in mediocrity

1.4 metres of drift on a measured track is a category-leading number. Everything built around that chipset is average, and the app is worse.

2 min read
7.4 out of 10 — Good, with caveats

The verdict

Good, with caveats

Worth buying if the compromises below suit you.

Ardent bought a positioning company in 2023 and the Pulse Track is what that purchase bought: 1.4 metres of average drift over 25 track laps, which is the best figure we have recorded at any price. Everything else is unremarkable. The optical heart rate lags a chest strap by nine seconds on intervals, the battery is mid-pack, and the app requires an account and deletes your history if you close it. If GPS accuracy is your problem, this solves it. If it is not, this is a $399 watch doing $250 of work.

Buy it if
You run trails, cities, or anywhere with unreliable signal, and route accuracy actually changes your training.
Skip it if
You do interval work off wrist heart rate, or you want a watch that also behaves like a smartwatch.

Tested for seven weeks, 240 miles, and 25 measured track laps. Bought at retail with our own money. How we test

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Best GPS accuracy we have measured, by a wide margin
  • Multi-band positioning holds up in cities and under tree cover
  • 10 ATM rating and a screen that has taken a knock without marking
  • Physical buttons that work with wet or gloved hands

Cons

  • Optical heart rate is nine seconds behind a chest strap on intervals
  • The app requires an account and does not store data locally
  • Data export is behind a subscription
  • No offline maps at this price

Almost every GPS watch is accurate enough on an open road. The differences appear where the signal does not: between buildings, under trees, and on a track, where the true distance is known to the centimetre and the watch has nowhere to hide.

1.4m
Average drift, 400 m track

Class average: 6.2 m

9s
Heart rate lag on intervals
26h
Multi-band GPS battery

The track test

Twenty-five laps of a certified 400 m track in lane one, watch on the left wrist, compared against the known distance. Then the same watch through a city loop with tall buildings on both sides, and a wooded trail section under full canopy.

On the bench
TestResultClass average
Track drift, average1.4 m6.2 m
Track distance error0.3%1.4%
Urban drift, average3.8 m11.9 m
Wooded drift, average4.1 m9.7 m
Time to first fix4 s9 s

25 laps of a certified 400 m track, plus 5 km urban and 5 km wooded loops, repeated three times. Reference is the mean of five multi-band watches between $350 and $600.

These are the best positioning numbers we have recorded, and not marginally. A 0.3% distance error over a session means a marathon measured to within 130 metres, which is inside the variation caused by your own running line.

Heart rate, which is the other half of a running watch

Steady state is fine — within 2 bpm of a chest strap for the whole of a 45-minute easy run. Intervals are not. On 400 m repeats the optical sensor takes about nine seconds to catch a rise and about the same to catch the fall, which means the number on your wrist describes the previous repetition.

The app

Ardent requires an account before the watch will finish setup. Activity history is stored on Ardent’s servers rather than on the phone; deleting the app removes local access to everything. Exporting your own data in a standard format is part of a $4.99 monthly tier.

We would score this harshly on any product. On a $399 one it is difficult to justify, and it is the single reason we cannot recommend the Pulse Track to someone who is not specifically buying it for the positioning.

Battery and build

Twenty-six hours with multi-band GPS active, eleven days as a watch. Both are mid-pack and both matched the claims. At 47 g with the supplied strap it disappears on the wrist, and after seven weeks including one hard contact with a doorframe the screen is unmarked.

The verdict

A specialist instrument sold as a general-purpose watch. If you run where GPS struggles, nothing else comes close. If you do not, you are paying $399 for a chipset you will never notice and an app you will resent.

How it scored

Weighted average of 6 criteria

  • GPS accuracy9.8

    1.4 m average drift on a measured 400 m track over 25 laps.

  • Heart rate6.0

    Excellent at steady state, nine seconds behind on intervals.

  • Battery7.5

    26 hours of multi-band GPS, 11 days in watch mode. Mid-pack.

  • Software and app5.2

    Account required, history stored server-side, exports are a paid tier.

  • Build and comfort8.0

    47 g, comfortable, and the screen survived a wall.

  • Value6.5

    One outstanding component in an otherwise ordinary product.

Overall7.4/10

Specifications

Positioning

Positioning specifications
ConstellationsGPS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS
BandsL1 and L5 multi-band
Track drift, measured1.4 m average over 25 laps

Sensors

Sensors specifications
Heart rateOptical, 5 LED
Interval lag vs chest strap9 seconds
OtherBarometric altimeter, compass

Battery and build

Battery and build specifications
Battery, multi-band GPS26 hours measured
Battery, watch mode11 days measured
Weight47 g with strap
Water resistance10 ATM

Where to buy the Pulse Track

We earn a commission when you buy through these links. It never changes what we recommend, and we buy every unit we test. How we stay independent.

Filed under

Who tested it

Nils Halvorsen

Reviewer, fitness and wearables

Puts roughly 60 miles a week into whatever the lab sends him, with a chest strap on and a track that does not lie about distance.

All reviews
8.8 out of 10 — Strong buy

Fitness

Ardent Stride 5 review: the daily trainer that survived 400 miles

Ardent's foam has always been good on day one. This is the first version that is still good on day two hundred.

Fitness

How to tell when your running shoes are actually finished

Not by the tread, and not by the mileage on the box. There is a better test, and it takes about thirty seconds on a kitchen counter.

Fitness

The best running shoes for daily training

Twelve trainers, 400 miles each, and a digital gauge. Most shoes in this category are good new. We were looking for the ones still good in March.